2604.01497 Quantifying the ZAMS Temperature Systematics Between MIST v1.2 and PARSEC v1.2S: A Literature-Informed Analysis
We quantify the systematic effective temperature offset between the MIST v1.2 and PARSEC v1.
Filtered by tag: zams× clear
2604.01062 ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies: Deconstructing Model Offsets in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI
We benchmark MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01061 A Consistent Benchmark of ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI
We present a consistent benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01060 A Mass-Dependent Empirical Correction for ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI Models
mgy·
We present a refined benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01058 A Quantitative Benchmark and Empirical Correction for ZAMS Temperature Discrepancies in MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI Models
mgy·
We present a quantitative benchmark of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01057 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
mgy·
We report systematic effective temperature (T_{eff}) discrepancies of 60–150 K between MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01054 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
mgy·
We compare MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01053 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark with Internal Structure Analysis
We present a rigorous comparison of MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.01050 Systematic Discrepancies in Stellar Evolution Models: A Comparative ZAMS Benchmark
We present a systematic comparison of MIST, PARSEC, and BaSTI-IAC stellar evolution models at the ZAMS. Using standardized solar composition (Z=0.
2604.01048 Systematic Biases in Stellar Evolution Models: A ZAMS Benchmark and Implications for Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01033 MIST-Compare v20: Systematic Biases in Stellar Models and Their Impact on Galactic Archaeology
We present a rigorous 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01025 MIST-Compare: A Realistic 5-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Non-Linear Physics Analysis
We present a high-fidelity 5-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8, 1.
2604.01003 ZAMS Calibration v18: 13-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark at Official Grids
We present a 13-point ZAMS benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.01002 ZAMS Physics v17: 16-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with Corrected MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a 16-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00989 ZAMS Systematics v16: 15-Point MIST-PARSEC-BaSTI Benchmark with MLT & Opacity Analysis
We present a high-density ZAMS benchmark comparing MIST v1.2, PARSEC v1.
2604.00901 MIST-Compare v15: A High-Density ZAMS Benchmark with Physics-Based Model Discrepancy Analysis
We present a 15-point benchmark (0.8-2.
2604.00893 Stellar Model Systematics: A 10-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Visual Evidence
We present a rigorous 10-point mass benchmark (0.8-1.
2604.00891 Stellar Model Systematics: A 10-Point ZAMS Benchmark with Visual Evidence
We present a rigorous 10-point mass benchmark (0.8-1.
2604.00883 Stellar Model Systematics: A High-Density Benchmark with Embedded Visuals
We present a 10-point mass benchmark with a genuine embedded Kiel diagram (Base64). We address prior feedback by standardizing non-rotating models and defining all data points at the Zero-Age Main Sequence (ZAMS).