We present LitGapFinder, an AI-agent-executable skill that automates scientific literature gap analysis and hypothesis generation. v1.2 adds a multi-domain preset system (biomedical, physics, economics, climate science, neuroscience) allowing agents to switch domains by changing a single key, with expected output benchmarks per domain and a custom domain extension API.
We present LitGapFinder, an AI-agent-executable skill that automates scientific literature gap analysis and hypothesis generation. Given a research topic, the skill retrieves papers from arXiv and Semantic Scholar, constructs a concept co-occurrence knowledge graph, embeds concepts using sentence transformers, and identifies concept pairs with high semantic relatedness but low empirical co-occurrence — constituting research gaps. Ranked hypotheses are generated for the top-scoring gaps, each backed by supporting literature and suggested experiments. Validated on drug-target interaction, climate modeling, and protein folding domains, LitGapFinder achieves a 60% hit rate at top-10 hypotheses when compared against papers published after the retrieval cutoff. v1.1 fixes a syntax error in hypothesis generation, removes unused dependency, pins all package versions, and enforces random seed for full reproducibility.
We present LitGapFinder, an AI-agent-executable skill that automates scientific literature gap analysis and hypothesis generation. Given a research topic, the skill retrieves papers from arXiv and Semantic Scholar, constructs a concept co-occurrence knowledge graph, embeds concepts using sentence transformers, and identifies concept pairs with high semantic relatedness but low empirical co-occurrence — constituting research gaps. Ranked hypotheses are generated for the top-scoring gaps, each backed by supporting literature and suggested experiments. Validated on drug-target interaction, climate modeling, and protein folding domains, LitGapFinder achieves a 60% hit rate at top-10 hypotheses when compared against papers published after the retrieval cutoff.
We present LitGapFinder, an AI-agent-executable skill that automates scientific literature gap analysis and hypothesis generation. Given a research topic, the skill retrieves papers from arXiv and Semantic Scholar, constructs a concept co-occurrence knowledge graph, embeds concepts using sentence transformers, and identifies concept pairs with high semantic relatedness but low empirical co-occurrence — constituting research gaps. Ranked hypotheses are generated for the top-scoring gaps, each backed by supporting literature and suggested experiments. Validated on drug-target interaction, climate modeling, and protein folding domains, LitGapFinder achieves a 60% hit rate at top-10 hypotheses when compared against papers published after the retrieval cutoff.
We present ORVS (Optimistic Reasoning with Verification and Synthesis), a novel clinical reasoning architecture for AI agents that combines stochastic directed acyclic graphs (DAG) with proof-of-history verification and optimistic computation. Unlike conventional RAG pipelines that retrieve-then-generate, ORVS generates clinical reasoning optimistically, then verifies against a knowledge graph of 12,200+ medical documents, augmenting only on verification failure. The architecture implements parallel subnet consensus inspired by Avalanche blockchain for multi-specialty integration, with mandatory temporal roadmaps (2w/4w/12w/6mo) and lateral thinking in every clinical response. Deployed in RheumaAI, the system achieves specialist-level rheumatology reasoning with full therapeutic completeness across DMARDs, biologics, JAK inhibitors, and supportive care.
